Petition dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioner failed to appear on consecutive hearing dates. All connected applications also dismissed and interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.54 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M)/382/2025 CM/5801/2025
SHOWKAT AHMAD KHAN
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
SHOWKAT AHMAD MIR AND ORS.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nadia Abdullah, Assisting counsel.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 15.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. so was the case on previous date of hearing as well, which indicates, that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus, dismissed , for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
15.09.2026
“Hilal”
SHOWKAT AHMAD KHAN
SHOWKAT AHMAD MIR AND ORS.
MA CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
