The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive hearing dates, indicating loss of interest. Interim directions were vacated.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.36 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M)/38/2024 CM/497/2024
GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs. JAVAID AHMAD KHAN AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 15.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on previous date of hearing as well, which indicates that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 15.09.2026
“Hilal”
Ghulam Mohammad Dar
Javaid Ahmad Khan and Ors
MA Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
