Petitioner withdrew the petition rendering the claimed relief infructuous. The high court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
None; petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 05
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 187/2026 CM No. 6289/2026
M/s Sri Sai Agro Composite Mills
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate
vs
J&K Grameen Bank
.…Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER (14.09.2026)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states at Bar that the relief
which the petitioner has claimed in this petition has been rendered infructuous and
therefore, he has instructions from the petitioner not to press this petition. Statement of learned counsel is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as
‘not pressed’.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE JUDGE
Jammu
14.09.2026
Sapna
M/s Sri Sai Agro Composite Mills
J&K Grameen Bank
Sanjeev Kumar
Shahzad Azeem
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
