This order dismisses a petition as having become infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted a fair statement indicating the matter would no longer be pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 05
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM (M) No. 183/2026
Daljit Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ankush Sharma, Advocate
Vs
Jagjit Singh
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
07.09.2026
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner makes a fair statement, with the efflux of time, and also in the light of the subsequent
record. Ordered accordingly.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, in the aforesaid backdrop, dismissed
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu 07.09.2026 Nikhil
Daljit Singh
Jagjit Singh
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
