Disposed
Basharat Ahmad Najar v. Abdul Razaq Reshi
J&K HCCM(M)/105/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 43 Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 43 Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 105/2026
BASHARAT AHMAD NAJAR
…Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s)
Through: Mr. Sameer Hassan Dar, Advocate
Vs.
ABDUL RAZAQ RESHI
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Touseef, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE. ORDER
08.09.2026.
Vide order dated 14.07.2026, time was extended in favour of the petitioner to come up with the deposit of Rs. 5,30,000/- by the next date and the Executing court- Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, (Munsiff) Tangmarg, was directed to submit a report as to whether petitioner has made any deposit or advancement of Rs. 2,20,000/- in connection with the execution proceedings.
Compliance report from the Executing court stands received, a perusal whereof reveals that petitioner, till date, has deposited Rs. 2,40,000/- in connection with the execution proceedings, which means that an amount of Rs. 5,10,000/- is still outstanding against him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not come up with any proof with respect to the deposit of balance amount. He seeks and is granted one week as last and final opportunity in the interest of justice to deposit balance amount of Rs. 5,10,000/- before learned Registrar Judicial of this court, failing which interim orders passed by this court shall be deemed vacated and Executing court shall be at liberty to proceed with the execution proceedings in accordance with law.
Disposed of along with connected CMs.
(RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE
Srinagar: 08.09.2026. Misba
Basharat Ahmad Najar
Abdul Razaq Reshi
Rajesh Sekhri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court