The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the petitioners had lost interest and had no representation.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; connected CMs dismissed; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 11 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 69/2025 CM(457/2025)
Fareeda Begum & Anr.
...Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: - None.
V/s
Ellis Hubertina Spandermn
… Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Urfana Mursalat, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE. (ORDER)
08.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. So was the
case on previous date of hearing as well. It seems that the Petitioners have
lost interest to prosecute this case any further.
Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, along
with connected CM(s).
Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
September 8th , 2026 “Shoaib javid”
Fareeda Begum & Anr.
Ellis Hubertina Spandermn
M. A. CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
