A single-judge bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution by the petitioners, noting their apparent loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 40
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 19/2022
CrlM No. 27/2022
Kala & Ors.
….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
UT of J&K & Anr.
….Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So was the case on the last two dates of hearing, the last being dated 06.12.2022, which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution
alongwith connected application.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A Chowdhary)
Judge
Jammu 15.02.2023 Ram Krishan
Kala & Ors.
UT of J&K & Anr.
M A Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
