The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. There is no substantive legal proposition as the matter was procedurally disposed of upon the petitioner's request to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 101
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM (M) No. 617/2022 CrlM No. 1277/2022
Abdul Rashid Khan & Ors.
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Rohit Kohli, Advocate
V/s
UT of J & K & Ors.
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Suraj Singh, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER 14.02.2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the instant petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners,
the instant petition along with connected application(s), if any, is thus dismissed,
as withdrawn.
Interim directions, if any, stand vacated.
(MA Chowdhary) Judge
Jammu: 14.02.2023 Manan
Abdul Rashid Khan & Ors.
UT of J & K & Ors.
MA Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
