The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners were absent and had lost interest in continuing the case since March 2022. Interim directions, if any, were vacated.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected CM dismissed; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 63 Regular List
HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 806/2022 CM 1767/2020
Ashfaq Ahmad and Ors
… Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Secretary and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. T.A. Shamsi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE.
ORDER 23.12.2022
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners since 18.03.2022. Today also, nobody is present on their behalf. It appears that
they have lost interest for further prosecution of the case. Therefore, the
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with the connected CM.
Dismissed for the non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 23.12.2022
Mubashir
Ashfaq Ahmad and Ors
Secretary and Ors.
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
