The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner had lost interest and the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CMs; Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 41 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 302/2018
Mohammad Amin Bhat
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Aatika and Anr.
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 23.12.2022
This petition with the efflux of time has become infructuous.
There is no representation on behalf of petitioner, which shows that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Dismissed for nonprosecution along with connected CM(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
23.12.2022 Manzoor
Mohammad Amin Bhat
Aatika and Anr.
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
