The petitioner filed an original writ petition which was declared infructuous by its own counsel. The court dismissed the petition finding it to be infructuous and vacated any interim direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.25 Regular list
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 432/2016
Vodafone Mobile Service Ltd.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M.A. Makhdoomi, Adv.
Vs.
Imran Hafiz and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
06.04.2022
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has been rendered
infructuous, as such, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. His statement is taken on record.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 06.04.2022
ARIF
Vodafone Mobile Service Ltd.
Imran Hafiz and others
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
