Petitioner failed to appear for four consecutive hearings. Petitioner was absent on the day of hearing. Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. Interim direction was vacated.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 17
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 258/2006
Gian Chand
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Arun Kumar and Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Diksha Handoo, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 22.12.2022
None has appeared for the petitioner on four previous consecutive
hearings and none appears today as well.
Continuous non-appearance of the petitioner shows that the petitioner is
not interested in prosecuting the petition.
The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stands vacated.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge
Jammu
22.12.2022 Bunty
Gian Chand
Arun Kumar and Ors.
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
