Dismissing Special Writ Petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on four consecutive hearing dates, thereby demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 44
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 413/2018 IA No. 01/2018
Mohd. Latief
….Petitioner(s)
Through:None.
V/s
State of J&K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
21.12.2022
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the previous three consecutive dates of hearing. Same is the position today also, suggesting that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition, as such, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Javed Iqbal Wani)
Judge
Jammu:
21.12.2022 Meenakshi
Mohd. Latief
State of J&K and others
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
