The single-judge bench of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court dismissed the appeal/petition as infructuous due to the passage of time and lack of instructions from counsel. No substantive legal proposition is laid down as the order is procedural and thin.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 11
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 155/2009
IA No. 182/2009
Bhatia Builders and Contractors
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Uday Bhaskar, Advocate
Vs
Union of India and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Mr. Uday Bhaskar, Advocate submits that he has no instructions,
otherwise also, this matter appears to have become infructuous with the passage
of time having regard to the relief claimed in this petition.
Therefore, this petition is dismissed, accordingly.
Interim direction if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu
09.03.2022
Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Bhatia Builders and Contractors
Union of India
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
