Varinder Singh and Anr. v. Uoi.Th.Ministry of Defence and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant, lacking instructions, prayed for dismissal. The writ petition was dismissed on this ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 35
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1166/2012 IA No. 2373/2014 IA No. 1616/2012
Varinder Singh and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Sr. Advocate
Vs
Union of India and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Sr.
Advocate submits that he has no instructions in this matter as such, he prays for dismissal of the present petition.
Therefore, the present petition is, dismissed accordingly.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 09.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Varinder Singh and another
Union of India and others
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court