The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the special leave petition for non-prosecution after noting the petitioner's failure to appear or file representations for multiple hearings, indicating a loss of interest in the matter.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 17
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1398/2010 IA No. 1974/2010 IA No. 1/2016
Ramita Kumari
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG for R- 1 to 4 Mr. B. S. Bali, Advocate for R-5
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
There had been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last
couple of hearings. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the
present petition. As such, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu
08.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Ramita Kumari
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
