M/S. Rashid Construction and Others v. Union of India and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition was dismissed as it was not pressed by the counsel. Prior interim direction stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.08 Regular list
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 113/2016 c/w OWP No. 227/2016 OWP No. 228/2016
M/S Rashid Construction and others
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M.I. Qadiri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Showkat Hussain, Adv.
Vs.
Union of India and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. T.M.Shamsi, ASGI with Ms. Salih Nissar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 07.04.2022
Counsel for the petitioners’ states that he has no instructions from the petitioners and he does not want to press this petition. His statement is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as not pressed along with all connected matters.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.04.2022
ARIF
M/S Rashid Construction and others
Union of India and others
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court