The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed the writ petition filed by Ajay Kumar for non-prosecution, citing the petitioner's absence from consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 12
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 365/2008
IA No. 564/2008
Ajay Kumar
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
State of J&K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER
None appeared for the petitioner on the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Even today also, same is position, which shows that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. The instant petition along with connected application(s), is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, stands vacated.
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge
Jammu: 16.11.2021 Angita
Ajay Kumar
State of J&K
Tashi Rabstan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
