The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear for consecutive hearings, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 44
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 228/2012 IA No. 297/2012
Janak Raj and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- None.
v/s
State of J and K and another …Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Sanchit Verma, Advocate vice Mr. F.A. Natnoo, AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER
None has appeared for the petitioners on the last two consecutive
hearings i.e., on 13.08.2021 and 20.10.2021.
None appears for the petitioners today as well. It appears that the
petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Thus, writ petition, is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(TASHI RABSTAN)
JUDGE
Jammu 16.11.2021 Renu
RENU BALA 2021.11.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Janak Raj and others
State of J and K and another
Tashi Rabstan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
