The dismissal of an ongoing writ petition (OWP No. 107/2008) by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladak due to the petitioner's failure to appear and non-prosecution over three consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 11
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 107/2008
IA No. 135/2008
Ladakh Auto. Hill Dev. Council Kargil
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
J.D.A. and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER
None appeared for the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing. Even today also, same is position, which shows that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. The instant petition along with connected application(s), is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge
Jammu: 16.11.2021 Angita
Ladakh Auto. Hill Dev. Council Kargil
J.D.A.
Tashi Rabstan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
