Bhimbro and Anr. v. Gurdial
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuousness of the petition declared. The petition was dismissed on this basis without engaging in substantive legal analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 66
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No. 42/2018 IA No. 1/2018
Bhimbro and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ved Bhushan Gupta, Advocate.
Vs
.…. Respondent(s)
Gurdial
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition
has become rendered infructuous. His statement is taken on record.
The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as rendered
infructuous.
(Puneet Gupta)
Judge
Jammu 08.12.2021 Pawan Chopra
PAWAN CHOPRA 2021.12.09 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bhimbro
Gurdial
PUNEET GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court