This is an interlocutory order in the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir. The court allowed an application for condonation of delay under Relevant Conc No. 184/2011, disposed of that specific application, and listed the main appeal for future hearing.
Condonation of delay allowed; Conc No.184/2011 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.6
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONC No.184/2011 in MA No.371/2011
Rafiq Ahmed …..Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. K. S. Thakur, Advocate.
Vs
U.O.I. and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER
Objections to the application for condonation of delay are not filed.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the
delay in filing the appeal is condoned. CONC No.184/2011 is disposed of .
The main appeal is taken on board.
Record be summoned.
List on 22.03.2022.
( Puneet Gupta ) Judge
Jammu 06.12.2021 Narinder
NARINDER KUMAR SHARMA 2021.12.06 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether objection to the application for condonation of delay must be filed.
Whether delay in filing the main appeal is condoned based on reasons stated in the application.
Rafiq Ahmed
U.O.I.
Puneet Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
