Santokh Singh v. Roshan Lal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was declared infructuous due to the passage of time and consequently dismissed. No substantive legal proposition is articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 16
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No. 145/2015 IA No. 1/2015
Santokh Singh
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. G. S. Thakur, Advocate
Vs
Roshan Lal and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of
time the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous along with connected IA.
(Puneet Gupta) Judge
Jammu 08.12.2021 Shammi
Santokh Singh
Puneet Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court