The High Court dismissed a transfer application for nonprosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or represent on three consecutive dates of hearing, indicating lack of interest in continuing the matter.
Application dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.No.208 After Notice Matters
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
CRTA No. 13/2019
Reyaz Ahmad Rather.
…Petitioner(s) Through: None. V/s
Shaheena Akhter.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
07.07.2021
On the last three consecutive dates of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also when the case is called out nobody turned up, to represent the petitioner. It, thus, clearly, transpires that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting this transfer application and the same is accordingly, dismissed for nonprosecution.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
07.07.2021
Shaista
SHAISTA RASHID SHAH 2021.07.14 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reyaz Ahmad Rather
Shaheena Akhter
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
