High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a petition and connected IA for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and lack of interest for four consecutive hearing dates.
Petition and connected IA dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 8
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CRMC No. 40 of 2017 IA No. 1/2017
Sabzar Ahmed Badar
.....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
v/s
Parveena Akhter
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the
last four dates of hearings and same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the present petition, along with the connected IA is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 11.11.2021 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Sabzar Ahmed Badar
Parveena Akhter
Rajnes Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
