The High Court dismissed an appeal and connected interim application for non-compliance with an order granting time to deposit maintenance arrears.
Petitioner dismissed for non-compliance with order dated 27.09.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 12
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 248/2017 IA No. 1/2017
Arun Singh Andotra
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Reena Jasrotia and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Manik Dutt, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
The petitioner sought and was granted ten days time to deposit the
arrears of maintenance, but the petitioner has not complied with the said order dated 27.09.2021. Rather, the petitioner remained absent on 13.10.2021. Same is
the position today also. As such, the present petition along with the connected IA
is dismissed for non compliance of the order.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu 10.11.2021 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
Arun Singh Andotra
Reena Jasrotia and others
Rajneesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
