Contempt petition disposed of as incumbent respondents retired or transferred, denying useful purpose for continued pendency.
Disposed giving liberty to seek implementation from present incumbents, with right to file further proceedings if unsatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 244 After Notice.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
CPSW No. 172/2009
Miss Mahroosa & Ors
…. Petitioner(s) Through: None
Versus
Mr Atul Duloo & Ors.
…Respondent(s).
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY, JUDGE
ORDER
During pendency of the instant contempt petition, the incumbent respondent(s) have changed their position either on account of retirement or transfer to some other office, as such, no useful purpose can be achieved by keeping the instant contempt petition pending, therefore, the same is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner(s) to approach the present incumbents with a copy of the order, subject matter of the contempt petition, for seeking implementation of the same, of course, in case same has remained unimplemented so far. Further, in the event, the petitioner(s), after availing the aforesaid liberty, is still dissatisfied as regards the implementation of the directions of this Court, Petitioner(s) shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for implementation of the same in accordance with law.
Contempt petition disposed of as above.
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge
Srinagar
09.03.2021 Mubashir
rafat nabi 2021.03.10 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Miss Mahroosa & Ors
Mr Atul Duloo & Ors.
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
