Irshad Ahmad Bhat and Another Vs Sandeep Kumar

During pendency of the instant contempt petition, the incumbent respondent(s) has changed his position either on account of retirement or transfer to some other office, as such, no useful purpose can be achieved by keeping the instant contempt petition pending, therefore, the same is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner(s) to approach the present incumbents with a copy of the order, subject matter of the contempt petition, for seeking implementation of the same, of course, in case same has remained unimplemented so far. Further, in the event, the petitioner(s), after availing the aforesaid liberty, is still dissatisfied as regards the implementation of the directions of this Court, Petitioner(s) shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings for implementation of the same in accordance with law.

¶13

Contempt petition disposed of as above.

¶14

(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge

¶15

Srinagar

¶16

09.03.2021 Mubashir

¶17

rafat nabi 2021.03.10 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Irshad Ahmad Bhat and Another v. Sandeep Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Irshad Ahmad Bhat and Another v. Sandeep Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bashir Ahmad Rather and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors. (Railways)

Mushtaq Ahmad Wani and Ors. Vs Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Cooperative Department)

Bilal Ahmad Tabardar Vs Mr. Gh Hyder Baht and Ors.

Adfar Altaf and Ors. Vs Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Health and Medical Education Department)

Miss Mahroosa and Ors. Vs Mr Atul Duloo and Ors.

Kafil Ur Rehman and Ors. Vs Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Home Department)