Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution as no advocates appeared before the High Court despite multiple notices and hearings, indicating lack of interest to prosecute the petition.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 213 After notice Cause list.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
….
CONC no. 72/2016
Naseema Begum and another
……. Appellant(s)
Through: None
Versus
Iftikhar Ahmad Sheikh and others ……. Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Nobody appeared in this petition on behalf of the petitioners for last several hearings. None appears today as well, suggesting lack of interest to prosecute this petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Srinagar 05.4.2021 Imtiyaz
IMTIYAZ UL GANI 2021.04.07 02:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Naseema Begum and another
Iftikhar Ahmad Sheikh and others
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
