The Single Judge dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on last three consecutive hearings and on the date of hearing, indicating loss of interest in prosecuting the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 212 After notice Cause list.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
….
CONC no. 13/2016
Mohammad Rafiq Wani and another
……. Appellant(s)
Through: None
Versus
Bajaj Allianz General Insu. Co. Ltd. ……. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Areeb Kawoosa, Advocate
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Nobody appeared in this appeal on behalf of the appellants on last three consecutive hearings. Nobody appears today as well. It appears that appellants have lost interest in prosecuting this petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Srinagar 05.4.2021 Imtiyaz
IMTIYAZ UL GANI 2021.04.07 02:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohammad Rafiq Wani and another
Bajaj Allianz General Insu. Co. Ltd.
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
