Order responding to counsel's submission that the arbitration petition was wrongly registered as AA No. directing Registry to correct the entry to Arb-P and listing it for future hearing.
Directing the Registry to correct the registration from AA No. to Arb-P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
AA No. 18/2017
U.O.I.
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- Ms. Garima Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Rohan Nanda, Adv.
V/s
Pawan Kumar Gupta
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Anil Khajuria, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER 02.11.2021
Mr. Rohan Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
Registry has wrongly registered this petition as AA whereas, the same has to be diarized as arbitration Arb-P.
Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction accordingly. List on 20.12.2021.
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge
Jammu: 02.11.2021 Abinash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act should be registered as AA No. or Arb-P.
U.O.I.
Pawan Kumar Gupta
TASHI RABSTAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
