The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution. The court noted that despite notice, requisite steps were not taken by the appellants over more than three years.
Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONC No. 15/2018
State and others
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Gulshan Begum and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER
01.11.2021
Notice was issued to the respondents on 05.02.2018. However, it is
reported that despite lapse of more than three years, requisite steps have not been
taken which shows that the applicants are not interested to prosecute the application.
The application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge
Jammu: 01.11.2021 Raj Kumar
State and others
Gulshan Begum and others
TASHI RABSTAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
