The High Court ordered that records of the service dispute petition be transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, following government notifications assigning such jurisdiction to the Tribunal.
Records of the present case are transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench, retaining a soft copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 99 Advance list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(WP(C) No. 380/2020 (O & M)
Suman Jee Bhat …..Petitioner(s)
v/s
Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
06.07.2020 “Manzoor” Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2020.07.13 11:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ jurisdiction should be transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, for service disputes of employees in Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh.
Suman Jee Bhat
Union Territory of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
