Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and granted the liberty to file a fresh petition.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition for the same relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 105
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1770/2020 CM Nos. 6165 & 6166/2020 (Through Video Conferencing)
Mohd Amin and another .…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sarfraz Hamid Rather, Advocate
v/s
Union Territory of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be
permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one for the same relief.
On 10.11.2020, the learned counsel for the petitioners had sought
time to place on record the Rules, Regulations or instructions governing the post in question.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 05.12.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.12.09 11:53 I agree to specified portions of this document
Mohd Amin and another
Union Territory of J&K and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
