In this writ petition, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir held that the petitioner's prayer had become infructuous. The court made no statement of reasons for this decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 281
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1251/2020 (O & M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Nasem Chauhan .…Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. J. S. Johal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karman Singh Johal, Advocate
v/s
Union Territory of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 05.12.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.12.09 11:53 I agree to specified portions of this document
Nasem Chauhan
Union Territory of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
