Petitioners in a writ petition moved to dismiss. The court permitted withdrawal as the stated grievance was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 112
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1382/2020 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Aavin Kumar Chadgal and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Petitioners in person.
v/s
University of Jammu and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. W.S. Nargal, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
The petitioners, who are present in person, in Court through VC
have submitted that their grievance has been redressed, hence, they may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition.
Ordered accordingly.
Jammu 07.09.2020 SUNIL-I
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.12 17:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
Aavin Kumar Chadgal
University of Jammu
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
