In an order permitting withdrawal of a written opinion petition, the Single Judge allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition without any substantive discussion on legal merits or relief details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 315
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 720/2012 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Pawan Suri …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Piyush Gupta, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be
permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 07.09.2020 SUNIL-I Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.12 17:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
Pawan Suri
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
