No substantive legal proposition as the order declares the writ petition infructuous and does not address the merits of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 203
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 493/2018 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Pardeep Kumar Sharma S/o Late Sh. Om Parkash Sharma
…Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. M.Y. Akhoon, Advocate
v/s
State of Jammu and Kashmir ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made
in the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 07.09.2020 SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.12 17:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
Pardeep Kumar Sharma
State of Jammu and Kashmir
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
