The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir held that a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is infructuous.
The petition was held infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 50
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 79/2004(O & M)
Mohd. Ashfaq …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 9419194583) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 15.06.2020 SUNIL-I Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMARSUNIL KUMAR 2020.06.19 14:362020.06.19 14:37 I agree to specifiedI agree to specified portions of this documentportions of this document
Mohd. Ashfaq
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
