Dismissed
Sukh Raj v. State Th. Education Deptt. and Ors.
J&K HCSWP/638/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 182 Supl. 3 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 182 Supl. 3
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 638/2006
(Through Audio Calling)
Sukh Raj …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419194583) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 15.06.2020 Meenakshi Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MEENAKSHI DEVI 2020.06.17 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukh Raj
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court