Petitioner's special written petition rendered infructuous. Court declared the prayer infructuous and ordered accordingly.
Prayer rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.22 Supl.1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2/2010(O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
Arun Prasher …Petitioner(s) Through:- Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate With Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419194583) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 12.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.16 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Arun Prasher
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
