The petitioner sought to revive a writ petition. The court observed contact had not occurred for 4-5 years, holding the prayer infructuous, but granted liberty to revive within three months.
Liberty granted to revive the petition within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 209 ANGITA DEVI 2020.12.05 13:55
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 700/2009 (O & M) (Through Video Conferencing) Dr. C. R. Munday .…Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Salathia, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner
has not contacted her for the last 4-5 years. Apparently the prayer made in
the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioner
to get the same revived within a period of three months from today in case the cause survives.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 02.12.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
Dr. C. R. Munday
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
