This order dismisses a contempt petition after accepting an unconditional apology for non-compliance of a prior judgment, allowing the petitioner liberty to avail appropriate remedy if aggrieved by the underlying order.
Dismissal of the contempt petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 253
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 300/2013 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Mohd. Lateef …Petitioner(s)
Through:v/s
Hirdesh Kumar, Secy. Education and others
….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 01.12.2020 SUNIL-I Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
ANGITA DEVI 2020.12.04 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition survives in view of unconditional apology tendered by respondents.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to appropriate remedy despite dismissal of contempt petition.
Mohd. Lateef
Hirdesh Kumar
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
