This order dismisses a habeas corpus petition filed in 2012 seeking protection for a marital union. The court held the prayer infructuous as petitioners raised no grievance, eliminating any threat to their life or liberty by 2020.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to absence of threat to life or liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 217 ANGITA DEVI 2020.12.05 13:55
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 339/2012 (O & M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Atul Sharma and another .…Petitioner(s)
Through: None
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 02.12.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a habeas corpus petition filed for marital protection remains maintainable when no threat to life or liberty exists.
Atul Sharma and another
State of J&K and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
