Partly allowed
Anil Gupta and Ors. v. State Th. Education Deptt. and Ors.
J&K HCSWP/33/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 09 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 09
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 33/2003 (O & M) (Through Audio Calling)
Anil Gupta and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Manpreet Kour, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419194583) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she may be
permitted to withdraw the present writ petition as the relief prayed for
therein has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu
01.06.2020 Vijay
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.07.08 11:59 I agree to specified portions of this document
ANIL GUPTA AND OTHERS
STATE OF J&K AND OTHERS
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court