Petritioner filed a writ petition regarding service dispute. Court held jurisdiction lies with Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, under the 2020 Notifications. Record transferred to CAT.
Record of the present case be transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 226 After Notice Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2125/2017 (O & M)
Ghulam Mohd
…..Petitioner(s)
V/s
State of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 07.09.2020 “Manzoor” Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2020.09.29 13:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the service dispute regarding employees of Union Territory of J&K and Ladakh falls within the jurisdiction of the Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ghulam Mohd
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
