The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir held that jurisdiction over service disputes of UT of J&K employees lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal. The case record was transferred to the CAT, Jammu Bench, retaining a soft copy.
Record of the present case transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench; parties directed to appear before the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 263 After Notice Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1456/2013 (O & M)
Rakesh Singh
…..Petitioner(s)
V/s
State of J&K and Ors.
….. Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE JAMMU 06.10.2020 “Manzoor” Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2020.10.08 10:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the jurisdiction to decide the service dispute of the Union Territory of J&K employees lies with the High Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Singh
State of J&K and Ors.
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
