Inder Singh Soodan v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir disposed of OWP No. 641/2009 by dismissing the writ petition on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir disposed of OWP No. 641/2009 by dismissing the writ petition on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 207
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR ATJAMMU
(Through video conferencing at Jammu)
OWP No. 641/2009 IA No. 854/2009
Inder Singh Soodan
.....Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate.
V/s
State of J&K and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the
instant petition has become infructuous. Her statement is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous along with connected IA(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
JAMMU
02.11.2020
Shivalee
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SHIVALEE KHAJURIA 2020.11.04 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Inder Singh Soodan
State of J&K
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court