Petitioner sought to withdraw OWP No. 302/2015 and connected IAs. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and vacated interim directions.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected IAs disposed; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 249
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR ATJAMMU
(Through video conferencing at Jammu)
OWP No. 302/2015 IA No. 473/2015
DeepaBala
.....Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Advocate.
V/s
State of J&K and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. H. A. Siddiqui, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition
has become infructuous and seeks withdrawal of the same.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with
connected IAs.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
JAMMU
03.11.2020 Shivalee
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SHIVALEE KHAJURIA 2020.11.05 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Deepa Bala
State of J&K
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
