Journey Line v. U.O.I.Th.Min.of Information and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed the original writ petition filed by Journey Line as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 296
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR ATJAMMU
(Through video conferencing at Jammu)
OWP No. 1278/2017 IA No. 1/2017
Journey Line
.....Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. A. K. Sawhney, Advocate.
V/s
Union of India and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition
has become infructuous and seeks withdrawal of the same.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with
connected IA(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
JAMMU
03.11.2020
Shivalee
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SHIVALEE KHAJURIA 2020.11.05 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Journey Line
Union of India
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court